Falcon Perception is a 0.6B parameter early-fusion vision-language model for open-vocabulary grounding and instance segmentation. Given an image and a natural language query, it returns zero, one, or many matching instances with pixel-accurate masks.
The model is built around a simple interface. Image patches and text tokens are processed together in a single Transformer using a hybrid attention mask: image tokens build bidirectional visual context, while text and task tokens decode causally conditioned on the image. For each instance, the model generates a short structured sequence of task tokens in a fixed order, <|coord|> then <|size|> then <|seg|>. The <|seg|> token acts as a mask query whose hidden state is projected and dotted with upsampled image features, producing a full-resolution binary mask without autoregressive mask generation.
An RL post-trained version of Falcon Perception is available in revision 19-08-2026. It is obtained by reinforcement learning (GRPO) post-training with a simple set-matching reward (a Hungarian-matched count that penalizes false negatives and false positives). This improves recall in high-density scenes (up to 500 instances per image) and removes the need for NMS and coordinate deduplication, at no change to the architecture or tokenizer. For further details read https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18881.
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"tiiuae/Falcon-Perception",
revision="19-08-2026",
trust_remote_code=True,
device_map={"": "cuda:0"},
)
Results on PBench (mask F1):
Split
Falcon Perception
RL post-trained
Δ
L0 Simple objects
63.7
64.9
+1.1
L1 Attribute
63.8
64.2
+0.5
L2 OCR guided
38.3
40.4
+2.1
L3 Spatial understanding
53.4
54.7
+1.3
L4 Relation binding
49.1
51.8
+2.7
Dense
72.3
80.5
+8.2
Average
56.8
59.4
+2.6
If you use this version, please cite:
@article{chaybouti2026falcon,
title={Falcon Perception-HD: High Density Perception via Reinforcement Learning},
author={Chaybouti, Sofian and Dahou, Yasser and Huynh, Ngoc Dung and Alami, Reda and Kuehne, Hilde},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.18881},
year={2026}
}
import numpy as np
from pycocotools import mask as mask_utils
for p in preds:
rle = p["mask_rle"]
# pycocotools expects bytes for counts
m = {"size": rle["size"], "counts": rle["counts"].encode("utf-8")}
mask = mask_utils.decode(m).astype(bool) # H x W
print(mask.shape, mask.sum())
SA-Co (open-vocabulary segmentation): 68.0 Macro F1 compared to 62.3 for SAM 3, with the main remaining gap being presence calibration (Average MCC 0.64 compared to 0.82 for SAM 3)
PBench: a diagnostic benchmark that breaks down performance by capability (attributes, OCR-guided disambiguation, spatial constraints, relations) and includes a dense long-context crowded split
Full tables, setup details, and ablations are in the report.
Presence calibration remains a key limitation for autoregressive dense interfaces. False positives are more likely on hard negatives than in DETR like segmentation models.
OCR-driven prompts depend on text size and image resolution. Small text and degraded scans are challenging.
Dense scenes benefit strongly from high resolution inputs. Low resolution can be sufficient to recognize that a concept is present, but insufficient to localize each instance precisely.
@article{bevli2026falcon,
title = {Falcon Perception},
author = {Bevli, Aviraj and Chaybouti, Sofian and Dahou, Yasser and Hacid, Hakim and Huynh, Ngoc Dung and Le Khac, Phuc H. and Narayan, Sanath and Para, Wamiq Reyaz and Singh, Ankit},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.27365},
year = {2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27365}
}
Files
17 files · 2.54 GBWeights 2.53 GB (safetensors). Sizes and sha256 from the signed manifest.